I posted a blog entry last week which included a link to a Nathan Winograd article, examining the benefits and risks presented by this very controversial “bill”. I stated that I agreed with Nathan on many of the issues he discussed, but that we parted ways on the final “vote” decision, as Nathan reservedly supported a “yes” vote. After a few days of consideration, he posted another blog entry and I’d like to share that with you. It stands on it’s own. Again, I invite you to read it…and to decide for yourself whether this bill actually protects the animals it “claims” to serve.
An Update to “Vote No on Mo Prop B”
Wednesday, October 27, 2010